doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg_final_rendering
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg_final_rendering [2024/07/31 09:53] – [Two pass encoding] niccolo | doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg_final_rendering [2026/08/23 21:03] (current) – [Pixel format considerations] niccolo | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| Notice that we selected a target bitrate of **4 Mbps** and a maximum bitrate of **6 Mbps**. Sepcifying both the //bitrate// and the //max bitrate tolerance// requires also to specify a //buffer size//; '' | Notice that we selected a target bitrate of **4 Mbps** and a maximum bitrate of **6 Mbps**. Sepcifying both the //bitrate// and the //max bitrate tolerance// requires also to specify a //buffer size//; '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A warning about the H.264 profile level ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | It turned out that **Kodi 19.4** (running on a Raspberry Pi 4 with **Raspbian GNU/Linux 11 Bullseye** o.s.) has some problems playing H.264 video files depending on the video format profile used for the encoding. The video actually starts to play, but nothing is seen on the screen; sometimes the screen goes totally green. Similarly a **Google TV** with Kodi 21.0 has problems with the same files, showing stuttering and video artifacts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here it is a table of playing capabilities based on experimental testing: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Format profile | ||
| + | | High@L5 | ||
| + | | High@L4 | ||
| + | | High@L4.1 | ||
| + | | High@5 | ||
| + | | High@5 | ||
| ===== Two pass encoding ===== | ===== Two pass encoding ===== | ||
| - | Here it is a recipe of **two-pass encoding** from an high quality //master// produced with Olive Video Editor. The target video will be a 6 Mbit stream, 1920x1080@30. The profile level selected is High@L4.1, so that the video will play nicely with Kodi 19.4 on the Raspberry Pi 4: | + | Here it is a recipe of **two-pass encoding** from an high quality //master// produced with [[olive_editor_tools# |
| <code bash> | <code bash> | ||
| Line 58: | Line 71: | ||
| -pass 1 \ | -pass 1 \ | ||
| -f matroska -y /dev/null | -f matroska -y /dev/null | ||
| + | # First pass produces two files: ffmpeg2pass-0.log and ffmpeg2pass-0.log.mbtree. | ||
| ffmpeg \ | ffmpeg \ | ||
| -i full32bit-veryslow-crf18-fullcolor.mkv \ | -i full32bit-veryslow-crf18-fullcolor.mkv \ | ||
| Line 71: | Line 84: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | The transcoding works on the video only, suppressing any audio stream (**%%-an%%** option). Using the **keyint=64** option will produce a keyframe every 64 frame (about | + | The transcoding works on the video only, suppressing any audio stream (**%%-an%%** option). Using the **keyint=64** option will produce a keyframe every 64 frames |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== A warning about the H.264 profile level ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | It turned out that **Kodi 19.4** (running on a Raspberry Pi 4 with **Raspbian GNU/Linux 11 Bullseye** o.s.) has some problems playing H.264 video files depending on the video format profile used for the encoding. The video actually starts to play, but nothing is seen on the screen; sometimes the screen goes totally green. Similarly a **Google TV** with Kodi 21.0 has problems with the same files, showing stuttering and video artifacts. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Here it is a table of playing capabilities based on experimental testing: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ^ Format profile | + | |
| - | | High@L5 | + | |
| - | | High@L4 | + | |
| - | | High@L4.1 | + | |
| - | | High@5 | + | |
| - | | High@5 | + | |
| ===== Pixel format considerations ===== | ===== Pixel format considerations ===== | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
| {{subsampling.png? | {{subsampling.png? | ||
| - | Is file size is not a concern, we might ask ourselves whether a pixel format with less loss of chroma information would be preferable. Obviously is useless to add more chroma information if the final rendering has the same resolution of the original video, but if we are **scaling down** the video resolution we may **retain chroma information** using a different pixel format. | + | If file size is not a concern, we might ask ourselves whether a pixel format with less loss of chroma information would be preferable. Obviously is useless to add more chroma information if the final rendering has the same resolution of the original video, but if we are **scaling down** the video resolution we may **retain chroma information** using a different pixel format. |
| The fact is that **in movies 4:2:0 is almost lossless visually**, which is why it can be found used in Blu-ray discs and a lot of modern video cameras. There is virtually no advantage to using 4:4:4 for consuming video content. | The fact is that **in movies 4:2:0 is almost lossless visually**, which is why it can be found used in Blu-ray discs and a lot of modern video cameras. There is virtually no advantage to using 4:4:4 for consuming video content. | ||
doc/appunti/linux/video/ffmpeg_final_rendering.1722412417.txt.gz · Last modified: by niccolo
