Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- doc:appunti:hardware:x96_mini [2023/10/22 22:23] – [Connecting an external USB 2.5 inches hard disk] niccolo
+++ doc:appunti:hardware:x96_mini [2023/10/22 23:01] – [Connecting a 2.5" hard disk via the USB] niccolo
@@ Line 239: / Line 239: @@
 ====== Connecting a 2.5" hard disk via the USB ======
+I connected an **external hard disk**; specifically it is a Toshiba MQ04UBF100, 2.5 inches hard drive, SATA 3.0, **1 Tb**, using an **USB 3.0** interface.
-Disk performance
+At first I tried to power the hard disk directly from the USB port of the X96 mini, but it turned out that the USB port **does not provide enough power**. The hard disk suddendly and randomly **disconnect and re-connect** with no reason. Here it is the relevant kernel messages displayed by the **dmesg** tool:
 <code>
-CoreELEC:~ # hdparm -t /dev/sda
+[  526.677574@2]- usb 1-2: USB disconnect, device number 2
-/dev/sda:
+[  526.678631@2]- blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 903710960
- Timing buffered disk reads:  92 MB in  3.05 seconds =  30.14 MB/sec
+...
+[  526.942573@3]- EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_journal_check_start:56: Detected aborted journal
+[  526.942578@3]- EXT4-fs (sda1): Remounting filesystem read-only
+[  526.942585@3]- EXT4-fs (sda1): previous I/O error to superblock detected
+[  526.942612@3]d Buffer I/O error on dev sda1, logical block 0, lost sync page write
+[  526.983449@2]- sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
+[  526.997855@2]- sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronize Cache(10) failed: Result: hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
+[  527.796877@2]- usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 4 using xhci-hcd
+[  527.938266@2]- usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0480, idProduct=0901
+[  527.938278@2]- usb 1-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=2, Product=3, SerialNumber=1
+[  527.938282@2]- usb 1-2: Product: External USB 3.0
 </code>
+The solution was to use a **externally powered USB hub**.
+I measured the disk performance on both the two USB ports (the white one and the black one), they measured exactly the same transfer rate. For the test I used the **hdparm** tool:
+<code>
+hdparm -t /dev/sda
+</code>
+<code>
+Timing buffered disk reads: 102 MB in  3.03 seconds =  33.71 MB/sec
+</code>
+This is about **270 Mbit/s**, which is near the 280 Mbps of the USB 2.0 //High Speed// specifications. This means that both the USB ports are actually USB 2.0.